|
FY2005 FRED Database Project Description: |
||
|
Project Information |
|
|
|
|
Project Title: |
CO2
Selective Ceramic Membrane for Water-Gas-Shift Reaction with Simultaneous
Recovery of CO2 |
|
|
|
Project I.D.: |
DE-FC26-00NT40922 |
|
|
|
FE Program: |
Carbon
Sequestration |
|
|
|
Research Type: |
Applied
Research |
|
|
|
Funding Memorandum: |
Cooperative
Agree't (nonCCT) - Tech
R&D |
|
|
|
Project Performer |
|
|
|
|
Performer Type: |
For-profit
Organization |
|
|
|
Performer: |
Media and
Process Technology Inc. |
|
|
|
Performer Address: |
|
|
|
|
Other Project Team Members: |
|
|
|
|
Project Dates |
|
|
|
|
Project Start Date: |
|
|
|
|
Project End Date: |
|
|
|
|
Project Location |
|
|
|
|
City: |
|
|
|
|
State: |
PA |
|
|
|
ZIP Code: |
15238-1368 |
|
|
|
Congressional District: |
4 |
|
|
|
Responsible FE Site: |
NETL |
|
|
|
Project Contact |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Liu, Paul
K.T. |
|
|
|
Telephone: |
(412)
826-3721 |
|
|
|
Fax Number: |
(412)
826-3720 |
|
|
|
Email Address: |
mandpmain@aol.com |
|
|
|
DOE/FE Contact |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Lang,
David Alan |
|
|
|
Telephone Number: |
(412)
386-4881 |
|
|
|
Site Location: |
NETL |
|
|
|
Email Address: |
David.Lang@NETL.DOE.GOV |
|
|
|
Cost & Funding Info. |
|
|
|
|
Total Estimated Cost: |
$900,000 |
|
|
|
DOE Share: |
$720,000 |
|
|
|
Non-DOE Share: |
$180,000 |
|
|
|
Project Description |
|
|
|
|
Project Description: |
The
primary objective of this proposed program is to develop a defect-free
hydrotalcite membrane for selective CO2 removal. A secondary objective is to demonstrate
that the membrane can be used under the water-gas-shift reaction environment;
i.e.; 300 to 600oC and in the presence of steam. Specific objectives include: |
|
|
|
Project Background: |
Since
substantial (1/4-1/3) anthropogenic emissions of carbon to the atmosphere
result from power generation [Ref. 1;22]; control of
CO2 emission from this particular source is considered one of the most
efficient strategies to achieve the national goal of greenhouse gas
management. This centralized; instead of dispersed; CO2 source will provide
an attractive opportunity to implement a cost-effective treatment solution.
However; the conventional end-of-the-pipe treatment approach; i.e.; capture of
CO2 after combustion with air; is not considered economical because
the gas volume increases tremendously (~ 3 times) after combustion. According to the literature; this approach
costs ~$40/ton of carbon (for a 500 MW fossil fuel-fired power plant; [Ref.1]);
not including the additional cost for transportation and disposal of
CO2. To meet the long term cost goal of $10/ton of
carbon listed in the FETC Carbon Sequestration Program [Ref.2;32]; a new
direction has been suggested [Ref.1] which requires a combination of the
following: |
|
|
|
Project Accomplishments: |
|
|
|